nanog mailing list archives

Re: Proper authentication model


From: Daniel Golding <dgolding () burtongroup com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:14:36 -0500


On 1/12/05 12:05 PM, "Joe Abley" <jabley () isc org> wrote:



On 12 Jan 2005, at 11:53, Hannigan, Martin wrote:

You mean you'd *request* a different path from different providers.

Provisioning a circuit from two different ^providers^, other than
your OC3 provider.

I realise that's what you meant.

My point was that competing, differently-named and
organisationally-separate suppliers of network services frequently use
common suppliers for metro fibre, long-haul transport, building access,
etc. Just because you buy different services from different providers
doesn't mean there will be no common points of failure.


Joe

Fate sharing is bad. The only way to be sure you aren't fate sharing is to
request GIS data from the carriers. And even that could be wrong...

- Dan
-- 




Current thread: