nanog mailing list archives

Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article]

From: "william(at)elan.net" <william () elan net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:43:24 -0800 (PST)



On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Owen DeLong wrote:

That's bad sincd DNAME is deprecated and has been removed from BIND.

Owen


No, its A6 that is to be depreciated (and too bad because its superior 
to AAAA), but last I heard DNAME stays as standard RR.

-- 
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william () elan net

Current thread:

Re: marking dynamic ranges, was fixing insecure email infrastructure, (continued)
- - - Re: marking dynamic ranges, was fixing insecure email infrastructure Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 24)
    - Re: marking dynamic ranges, was fixing insecure email infrastructure Markus Stumpf (Jan 25)
    - Re: marking dynamic ranges, was fixing insecure email infrastructure Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 25)
    - Re: marking dynamic ranges, was fixing insecure email infrastructure Markus Stumpf (Jan 25)
    - Re: marking dynamic ranges, was fixing insecure email infrastructure J.D. Falk (Jan 25)
    - Re: marking dynamic ranges, was fixing insecure email infrastructure Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 25)
    - Re: marking dynamic ranges, was fixing insecure email infrastructure Markus Stumpf (Jan 25)
    - Re: marking dynamic ranges, was fixing insecure email infrastructure Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 25)
    - Message not available
    - Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Mark Andrews (Jan 13)
    - Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Owen DeLong (Jan 13)
    - Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] william(at)elan.net (Jan 13)
    - Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 13)
    - Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Todd Vierling (Jan 14)
    - Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Mark Andrews (Jan 14)
    - Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Paul Vixie (Jan 14)
    - Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Markus Stumpf (Jan 24)
    - Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Mark Andrews (Jan 24)
    - Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Markus Stumpf (Jan 25)
    - Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Mark Andrews (Jan 25)
    - Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Markus Stumpf (Jan 25)
    - Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Mark Andrews (Jan 25)

(Thread continues...)