nanog mailing list archives

Re: panix hijack press

From: Thornton <thornton-nanog () cierragroup com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:14:57 -0700


On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 15:51 -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Darrell Greenwood wrote:

customers' domains. Panix.com says its domain name was locked, and
that despite this, it was still transferred. ®


I seem to recall someone saying it wasnt locked, now theyre saying it was?

-Dan

panix claims it was locked but I dont think it was.  Like was mentioned
they locked there other domains after panix.com was taken over.  Why
would they just lock one domain?

Current thread:

Association of Trustworthy Roots? William Allen Simpson (Jan 16)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? Elmar K. Bins (Jan 16)
  - Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? (probably OT) Tom Vest (Jan 16)
  - Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? James Edwards (Jan 16)
    - panix hijack press William Allen Simpson (Jan 16)
    - Re: panix hijack press Paul G (Jan 16)
    - Re: panix hijack press Darrell Greenwood (Jan 20)
    - Re: panix hijack press Dan Hollis (Jan 20)
    - Re: panix hijack press Thornton (Jan 20)
    - Re: panix hijack press William Allen Simpson (Jan 20)
    - Re: panix hijack press Mark Jeftovic (Jan 20)
    - Re: panix hijack press William Allen Simpson (Jan 20)
    - Re: panix hijack press William Allen Simpson (Jan 20)
    - Re: panix hijack press Thornton (Jan 20)
    - Re: panix hijack press Richard Parker (Jan 20)
    - Re: panix hijack press William Allen Simpson (Jan 20)
    - Enough. (was Re: panix hijack press) Steve Gibbard (Jan 20)
    - Re: panix hijack press Thornton (Jan 20)
    - Re: panix hijack press Matthew Sullivan (Jan 21)

(Thread continues...)