nanog mailing list archives
Re: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:07:48 +0530
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:18:03 +0000, Michael.Dillon () radianz com <Michael.Dillon () radianz com> wrote:
I hope that the NANOG reform discussion spends a good bit of its time on articulating a vision for the future of a membership-based NANOG organization, and not worry so much about past problems.
That is something I am working on, as it strikes me as a really good way to bring more asian operators into the mainstream. A clueful contact at an ISP prevents people dropping in blackhole routes and access.db entries for huge netblocks when they see the first sign of abuse from out of there ... which would be a very good thing. INOC-DBA does get talked about on several other operator lists like apricot and sanog .. but there's not nearly enough adoption yet. I'm still hopeful about seeing it grow in popularity and get some critical mass. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com Bruce Tonkin (Jan 20)
- Date of transfer request (was: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com) Richard Parker (Jan 20)
- Re: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 20)
- Re: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com Hank Nussbacher (Jan 20)
- Re: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com Michael . Dillon (Jan 20)
- Re: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 20)
- Re: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com Hank Nussbacher (Jan 20)
- Re: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com William Allen Simpson (Jan 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com Bruce Tonkin (Jan 20)
- improving the registrar transfer process William Allen Simpson (Jan 20)
- Re: improving the registrar transfer process Thornton (Jan 20)
- improving the registrar transfer process William Allen Simpson (Jan 20)