nanog mailing list archives
RE: improving the registrar transfer process
From: Thornton <thornton-nanog () cierragroup com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:55:29 -0700
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 10:28 +1100, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
Interestingly, the ICANN equivalent in Australia (auDA), does pro-actively enforce policies, and even took Capital Networks to court on the basis that they could be de-accredited as a registrar for .au, if they continued not to allow transfers for .com. See: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2004/324.html The original judgment is at: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/federal_ct/2004/808.html
yes they did. now pacnames in another country supposedly bought capital... at least they are allowing you to transfer away this time though auDA being proactive is good...now its time icann is...
Current thread:
- RE: improving the registrar transfer process Bruce Tonkin (Jan 20)
- RE: improving the registrar transfer process william(at)elan.net (Jan 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: improving the registrar transfer process Bruce Tonkin (Jan 20)
- RE: improving the registrar transfer process Thornton (Jan 20)
- RE: improving the registrar transfer process Bruce Tonkin (Jan 21)