Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change?

[Bill Nash <billn () billn net>]

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:

> Hi Bill, to be fair, there are specific forum for discussion of spam 
> tackling measures and people have been pointed in that direction on 
> numerous occasions, however in its generic sense it might still be on 
> topic for nanog.
>
> I note the original post that sparked this (assuming i'm following these
> discussions correctly) was actually about abuse desks not spam specifically...
>
> So if the question is about anti-spam i think its OT, if its about abuse 
> or a new spam technique then its probably of interest.

I would agree with this. I touched on that with mention of trojaned 
sources, but perhaps I should have been more clear. Thanks for the 
correction.

- billn