nanog mailing list archives

Re: 'Whois protection service'


From: Mark Foster <blakjak () blakjak net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:18:26 +1300 (NZDT)




On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:26:00 +1300, Mark Foster said:

I'm unsure how appropriate it is to post anything more specific in the
open forum, but i've never seen this before. Whats the deal with hiding a
domain name owners true identity?

Happens all the time..

*snip*


(They're not *all* bad, evill and black-hat - as far as I can tell, GoDaddy
provides a similar service - but if you end up calling them because there's a
problem, they're not at all amused - and take their ire out on the problem user)

Further discussion is probably better done on spam-l () peach ease lsoft com


Thanks to those who've responded both on and off list - it seems the rules
are different on your side of the world. I'll go the other way (as I
usually do) and chase the IPs involved (I usually pursue both out of
curiosity, but had not seen the aforementioned whois output before).

My thanks - can close this thread now before I get moderated. :)

Mark.


Current thread: