nanog mailing list archives

Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008


From: David Conrad <david.conrad () nominum com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 12:35:14 -0700


Christian,

On Jul 7, 2005, at 11:02 AM, Kuhtz, Christian wrote:
What's the problem with independent address space for every entity
(company, family, enterprise) which wants it?
It doesn't scale.  Regardless of Moore's law, there are some
fundamental physical limits that constrain technology.
Once you add that bit of reality to it, the scaling requirement goes
down substantially.  Wouldn't you agree?

My feeling is that the question isn't how much memory, but rather how much CPU and bandwidth is necessary to deal with routing thrash. Yes, you can aggregate different things to try to reduce the number of entries, but that would seem to go against the general idea Alexei was suggesting. I mean, I'm an entity, and it'd be cool to have my own routed PI address and not have to deal with reconfiguring my network when I took my laptop from work to home...

Rgds,
-drc


Current thread: