nanog mailing list archives
Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008)
From: Sean Doran <smd () cesium clock org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 22:24:22 +0100
On 7 Jul, 2005, at 21:10, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
Real firewalls pass inbound traffic because a state table entry exists. NATs do the same thing, with nasty side-effects. There is no added security from the header-mangling.
To which Len Bosak quipped a few years ago: "If you don't know its name, you can't curse it".
Sean.
Current thread:
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008), (continued)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Crist Clark (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Fred Baker (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Crist Clark (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Sean Doran (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Sean Doran (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) David Andersen (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Daniel Senie (Jul 09)
- RE: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Tony Hain (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Sean Doran (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Joseph S D Yao (Jul 08)