nanog mailing list archives
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 00:16:20 +0200
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 12:08:08AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On the other hand a large DFZ routing table would simply dampen its growth by itself. If it gets to costly to multihome because of the hardware requirements only few would be able to so. Ergo we have a negative feedback system here keeping itself in check. Case solved and closed.
Multihomed end sites usually get away with receiving only default route or some partial routes from their upstreams. So technically you can BGP multihome with Cisco 1600 or even smaller easily (dunno where BGP support is starting to become available). Regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr () cluenet de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
Current thread:
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008, (continued)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Andre Oppermann (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Meyer (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Andre Oppermann (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Brad Knowles (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Brad Knowles (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Matt Ghali (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Brad Knowles (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Andre Oppermann (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Daniel Roesen (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Andre Oppermann (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Daniel Roesen (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Joe Abley (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Daniel Roesen (Jul 09)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Brad Knowles (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Tony Li (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Brad Knowles (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 09)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jul 09)