nanog mailing list archives
Re: London incidents
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:11:09 -0400
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:26:33 +1200, Mark Foster said:
"Using phone company records, researchers assessed phone use immediately before the crash. They found a third of calls in the 10 minutes before the crash were made on cellphones.
And the *other* 2/3rd of the calls were made on what, exactly? A land line just before departure, followed by a crash less than 10 minutes into the drive? (This would tie in well with the "agitated by the phone call" theory advanced by JC Dill...)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: London incidents, (continued)
- Re: London incidents Mark Newton (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Jim Popovitch (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents sthaug (Jul 12)
- RE: London incidents Neil J. McRae (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Chris A. Epler (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Brad Knowles (Jul 12)
- Message not available
- Re: London incidents Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Mark Foster (Jul 12)
- Message not available
- Re: London incidents Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents JC Dill (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Crist Clark (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Bill Stewart (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Joseph S D Yao (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidentsn David Lesher (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Jim Popovitch (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Jim Popovitch (Jul 12)