nanog mailing list archives
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:21:05 -1000
With G.711 and 20ms voice samples, with IPv4 you get: 20 bytes IP + 8 bytes UDP + 12 bytes RTP + 160 bytes payload 20% overhead. Now with IPv6. Say we use shim6 or something like that to implement multihoming too. The shim6 header isn't decided yet, but I suppose it's got to contain at least a pair of addresses (32 bytes). 40 bytes IP + 32 bytes shim6 8 bytes UDP + 12 bytes RTP + 160 bytes payload 36.5% overhead
hey! we charge by the byte. so ipv6 is looking better and better!
Current thread:
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008, (continued)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Daniel Golding (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 (OT reminder) John Curran (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Rich Emmings (Jul 11)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Hank Nussbacher (Jul 11)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 bmanning (Jul 11)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 william(at)elan.net (Jul 11)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Hank Nussbacher (Jul 12)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 12)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Phillip Vandry (Jul 12)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 12)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jul 12)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Andersen (Jul 12)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Phillip Vandry (Jul 12)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Bill Stewart (Jul 12)
- Comment - Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Joseph T. Klein (Jul 12)
- Re: Comment - Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Todd Vierling (Jul 13)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Robert E . Seastrom (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Scott McGrath (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Jeroen Massar (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Andre Oppermann (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Jeroen Massar (Jul 07)