nanog mailing list archives

Re: Openbsd fixes icmp protocol bugs apparently ignored by the IETF


From: Pekka Savola <pekkas () netcore fi>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:53:26 +0300 (EEST)


On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

On 13/07/05, Chris Cappuccio <chris () nmedia net> wrote:
He doesn't say that the IETF ignored him.  That's not accurate.  He
clearly says that the IETF did not care.  There's a difference.  The
issues were not considered important enough to fix by the IETF (as
the problems lie in the basic ICMP specifications.)

As for his claims about the Cisco manager, nobody called him a
terrorist, that's outright absurd.  Read more carefully.  What they did was

Some pointers to IETF threads would be great

Look for "" at TCPM WG archives at http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/index.html

There have been multiple threads on the subject -- look for "ICMP". In the last 5 months, the following messages have generated message thread(s).

http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg01026.html
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg01018.html
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg01066.html
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg01111.html
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg01185.html
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg01210.html

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings


Current thread: