nanog mailing list archives

Re: ICANN, VeriSign Will Consider Changes on .net Agreement


From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner () nic-naa net>
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 02:45:27 -0400


I don't know if it is the repeated "ICANN can't be trusted / is corrupt"
messaging, or the sensitivity of the .NET "rebid" (aka VGRS deregulation)
that got the prompt action --

It's more that ICANN has figured out that registrars are where all
their revenue comes from, and if they dragged their feet signing
contracts or paying, ICANN has precious little leverage over them.

<regisitrar_hat="on">
<regisitrar_constituency_hat="on">
<regisitrar_constituency_chair_candidate_hat="former">

That wasn't our reading of the balance of forces (contractualand share)
as recent as the last budget go-around.

YMLV.

</registrar_*>

Vint's sent a note to the Registrar Constituency Chair in reply to the note
from the 30 RC members present at the Luxembourg meeting.

Eric


Current thread: