nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN, VeriSign Will Consider Changes on .net Agreement
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner () nic-naa net>
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 02:45:27 -0400
I don't know if it is the repeated "ICANN can't be trusted / is corrupt" messaging, or the sensitivity of the .NET "rebid" (aka VGRS deregulation) that got the prompt action --It's more that ICANN has figured out that registrars are where all their revenue comes from, and if they dragged their feet signing contracts or paying, ICANN has precious little leverage over them.
<regisitrar_hat="on"> <regisitrar_constituency_hat="on"> <regisitrar_constituency_chair_candidate_hat="former"> That wasn't our reading of the balance of forces (contractualand share) as recent as the last budget go-around. YMLV. </registrar_*> Vint's sent a note to the Registrar Constituency Chair in reply to the note from the 30 RC members present at the Luxembourg meeting. Eric
Current thread:
- ICANN, VeriSign Will Consider Changes on .net Agreement Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 14)
- Re: ICANN, VeriSign Will Consider Changes on .net Agreement Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jul 14)
- Re: ICANN, VeriSign Will Consider Changes on .net Agreement Elmar K. Bins (Jul 14)
- Re: ICANN, VeriSign Will Consider Changes on .net Agreement John Levine (Jul 17)
- Re: ICANN, VeriSign Will Consider Changes on .net Agreement Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jul 17)
- Re: ICANN, VeriSign Will Consider Changes on .net Agreement Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jul 14)