nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is there a "alternative" way of doing kvm-over-IP
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () darkwing uoregon edu>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 14:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Drew Weaver wrote:
Buying the hardware boxes sounds pretty attractive, but I wondered if any industrious open sourcers have come up with anything that any NANOG-ers have come across that would do something similar to what the Dell 2161DS box would do. I realize we would need a server with some cards in it to terminate the connections and then some cards to go in the boxes, we just need a bit more density than 16 ports.
I've been mostly successful in eliminating the need for most of our kvm ports, formerly with pc weasels, and more recently with servers supporting ipmi directly or through an addon card. the pc weasels required terminal servers the ipmi cards just require that you put the first network interface on the machine someplace you can reach.
weasel http://www.realweasel.com/ ipmi http://www.intel.com/design/servers/ipmi/
Tia -Drew
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting joelja () darkwing uoregon edu GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2
Current thread:
- Is there a "alternative" way of doing kvm-over-IP Drew Weaver (Jul 20)
- Re: Is there a "alternative" way of doing kvm-over-IP alex (Jul 20)
- Re: Is there a "alternative" way of doing kvm-over-IP Joel Jaeggli (Jul 20)
- Re: Is there a "alternative" way of doing kvm-over-IP Joseph S D Yao (Jul 20)
- Re: Is there a "alternative" way of doing kvm-over-IP Todd Vierling (Jul 20)
- RE: Is there a "alternative" way of doing kvm-over-IP Neil J. McRae (Jul 21)
- Re: Is there a "alternative" way of doing kvm-over-IP Todd Vierling (Jul 20)