nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 push doesn't have much pull in U.S
From: Andre Oppermann <nanog-list () nrg4u com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:55:51 +0200
Simon Leinen wrote:
Christopher L Morrow writes:On Sat, 16 Jul 2005, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:And I'm sure Sprint and Verio (MCI/Worldcom/UUNET too? I have aI know verio does, Sprint I believe also does, and UUNET does... everyone has restrictions on the service though (native or tunnel'd type restrictions)For what it's worth, we get IPv6 transit connectivity from all our upstreams: Global Crossing, TeliaSonera and Level(3). In each case, IPv6 runs over a short tunnel to a router somewhere in the upstream's backbone. I assume that's because they either run separate backbones for IPv4 and IPv6, or because our access routers aren't IPv6-enabled for some reason.
How much IPv6 traffic (excluding NNTP) do you have compared to IPv4 traffic? -- Andre
Current thread:
- IPv6 push doesn't have much pull in U.S Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 15)
- Re: IPv6 push doesn't have much pull in U.S Daniel Roesen (Jul 15)
- Re: IPv6 push doesn't have much pull in U.S Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 16)
- Re: IPv6 push doesn't have much pull in U.S Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 16)
- Re: IPv6 push doesn't have much pull in U.S Simon Leinen (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 push doesn't have much pull in U.S Andre Oppermann (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 push doesn't have much pull in U.S Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPv6 push doesn't have much pull in U.S Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 15)
- RE: IPv6 push doesn't have much pull in U.S Kuhtz, Christian (Jul 18)
- Re: IPv6 push doesn't have much pull in U.S Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 18)
- RE: IPv6 push doesn't have much pull in U.S Kuhtz, Christian (Jul 18)