nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:14:34 +0900
I think there is also a LOT concern about all the unpatched routers that remain unpatched simply because the admins don't feel like spending a week running the cisco gauntlet to get patches when you don't have a support contract with cisco. Its like cisco doesn't want you to patch or they would make it easy.
could they be unpatched because no one has sent out a notice saying "versions before X have known vulnerabilities. upgrade now to one of the following: ...?" randy
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up, (continued)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Daniel Golding (Jul 27)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Network Fortius (Jul 27)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Jason Frisvold (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Dan Hollis (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Florian Weimer (Jul 28)
- RE: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Geo. (Jul 28)
- RE: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Randy Bush (Jul 28)
- RE: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up John A. Kilpatrick (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up James Baldwin (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Randy Bush (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up James Baldwin (Jul 28)