nanog mailing list archives
Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:03:58 +0530
On 29/07/05, Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi> wrote:
Filtering anything else than port 80 and maybe 53 would allow them to experience the Internet in safe and controlled manner!
Petri, if someone has to actually ask on nanog about ddos mitigation tools, he is much better off not having irc bots, or other such kick me signs^W ddos magnets on his network. Real world experience facing down ddos attacks, and googling for docs of other peoples' real world experiences should have come in useful long before asking for ddos mitigation 101 on nanog, if he really made a conscious decision to host these. --srs -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Florian Weimer (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Florian Weimer (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Petri Helenius (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services James Feger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services chip (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)