nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution
From: Steve Feldman <feldman () twincreeks net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:28:41 -0700
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:09:37PM -0400, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
I agree, this is an imperfect mechanism, but there was a desire to get the process going well in advance of the next meeting. Otherwise we would have to wait a few extra months. Also, note that not all voters will be at any given meeting.All the broadcast mechanisms will be.
You know, on my way home tonight I had the wild notion that someone could host a webcast discussion or debate by the candidates before the voting starts. The candidates and a moderator could dial in, and anyone who wants could listen to the stream, either live or recorded. Note that I'm not volunteering for any of this. :) Steve
Current thread:
- RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Hannigan, Martin (Jun 20)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Steve Feldman (Jun 20)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Susan Harris (Jun 21)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution vijay gill (Jun 20)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Randy Bush (Jun 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Hannigan, Martin (Jun 20)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Tony Li (Jun 20)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Brad Knowles (Jun 20)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Tony Li (Jun 20)
- RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Hannigan, Martin (Jun 20)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Steve Feldman (Jun 20)
- RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Steve Gibbard (Jun 21)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Daniel Golding (Jun 21)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Steve Feldman (Jun 20)