nanog mailing list archives
Re: More long AS-sets announced
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:27:18 +0100
Can the people responsible for this please reconsider and put things on hold until certain conditions are met: Publish a detailed workplan including AS-es used, windows and risk analysis to the various mailinglists.
given they are using their own prefixes, can you please tell us what risk there might be.
Some assurance that input files are checked for typos.
hopefully better than the mean of operators doing so :-)/2 randy
Current thread:
- RE: Localized mail servers, global scope, (continued)
- RE: Localized mail servers, global scope Andrew Staples (Jun 22)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Dave Crocker (Jun 22)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Michael . Dillon (Jun 23)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Dave Crocker (Jun 23)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Peter Corlett (Jun 23)
- Message not available
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Randy Bush (Jun 20)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced brett watson (Jun 20)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Jerry Pasker (Jun 20)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced MarcoH (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Randy Bush (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced MarcoH (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Randy Bush (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Pete Templin (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Bruce Campbell (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Jon Lewis (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Tony Li (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Jon Lewis (Jun 21)