nanog mailing list archives
Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
From: Michael.Dillon () btradianz com
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:45:30 +0100
You don't need a central MX if each site MTA knows which users are at which sites. Incoming email may have to take an extra hop if it comes in to the wrong site, but that's a consequence of the specification that no implementation can fix.
In other words, SMTP does not have the equivalent of an HTTP redirect which is what he wants here. Maybe SMTP really is broken? ;-) --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: More long AS-sets announced, (continued)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Jeroen Massar (Jun 20)
- Localized mail servers, global scope Andrew Staples (Jun 22)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Tony Finch (Jun 22)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 22)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Andre Oppermann (Jun 22)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Tony Finch (Jun 22)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 22)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Tony Finch (Jun 22)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Brad Knowles (Jun 22)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Tony Finch (Jun 22)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Michael . Dillon (Jun 23)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Peter Corlett (Jun 23)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Michael . Dillon (Jun 23)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Dave Crocker (Jun 23)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Tony Finch (Jun 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Dave Stewart (Jun 23)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Dave Crocker (Jun 23)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Tony Finch (Jun 23)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Dave Crocker (Jun 23)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope william(at)elan.net (Jun 23)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 23)