nanog mailing list archives
Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
From: Joe Abley <jabley () isc org>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:44:45 -0400
On 2005-06-03, at 10:26, Andre Oppermann wrote:
christian.macnevin () uk bnpparibas com wrote:I guess it's been a while since I've played with it, but isn't this prettywell what happens with uRPF anyhow?No, my proposal works as long as the customer advertizes their prefixesvia BGP, not matter how long the path or what community attributes areset (for example NOEXPORT). No matter how they send it, as long as theysend it, it works fine.
So, your proposal is loose-mode uRPF?
Current thread:
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?, (continued)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Joe Maimon (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Stephen Stuart (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? christian . macnevin (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Andre Oppermann (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Christopher L. Morrow (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 03)
- RE: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Olsen, Jason (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? christian . macnevin (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Andre Oppermann (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Joe Abley (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Joe Maimon (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Pete Templin (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Andre Oppermann (Jun 03)