nanog mailing list archives
Re: More on Vonage service disruptions...
From: "Network.Security" <Network.Security () target com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:12:53 -0600
So...how much of the revenue stream is built around the actual facilities (i.e. copper, fiber, etc) ownership monopoly? Shouldn't senior staff recognize the short-sightedness of building one revenue stream from two distinct sources: one content delivery and one plant ownership? Sell access first for a profit and then add ala carte services for a profit, don't mix them. Brad Swanson bradley.swanson () target com -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Robert M. Enger Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 1:57 PM To: Fergie (Paul Ferguson); nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: More on Vonage service disruptions... The subject is of most concern at the edge. There are multiple long-haul providers, but often the consumer has only one option for multi-megabit connectivity. The entity currently enjoying the edge monopoly attempts to create vertical service alignment, to maximize profit. They DON'T want to provide packet data service, they want to provide ALL services (control content, filter, etc). This is not a technical matter, it's senior staff maximizing rate of return. To diverge from VoIP, an interesting situation will present itself in the future. Verizon is installing FTTH. Data offerings in their present service area are: 5, 15, and 30Mbps downstream. http://www22.verizon.com/fiosforhome/channels/fios/root/package.asp These speeds would support broadcast quality video delivery (even HD quality) if properly implemented. As hot a topic as voice is, the total money involved is decreasing. Video services, however, still represent a huge revenue stream. Will Verizon be a pure pipe provider? Or, will they attempt to control services? It would be nice to see Comcast get some meaningful competition. Till now, they could never find the money to upgrade or maintain their RF plant, but they had money available to pursue acquisition of Disney... As troublesome as VoIP may (appear) to be, imagine video. Very high duty-cycle, multi-megabit streams. "36ccs", so to speak. But, content creators could sell directly to end users. Potentially, no cable company, no TV networks. Perhaps even the studio structure will collapse. A lot depends on how well the FTTH providers, and their long-haul backbone partners do their job. Whether they embrace disruptive change, or resist it as an annoyance to their routine.
Current thread:
- Re: More on Vonage service disruptions..., (continued)
- Re: More on Vonage service disruptions... Michael . Dillon (Mar 03)
- RE: More on Vonage service disruptions... kwallace (Mar 02)
- RE: More on Vonage service disruptions... Jeff Rosowski (Mar 02)
- RE: More on Vonage service disruptions... andrew2 (Mar 02)
- RE: More on Vonage service disruptions... Daniel Senie (Mar 02)
- Re: More on Vonage service disruptions... Niels Bakker (Mar 03)
- RE: More on Vonage service disruptions... Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Mar 02)
- RE: More on Vonage service disruptions... Greg Boehnlein (Mar 02)
- RE: More on Vonage service disruptions... Jeffrey Race (Mar 03)
- RE: More on Vonage service disruptions... Michael . Dillon (Mar 03)
- RE: More on Vonage service disruptions... Greg Boehnlein (Mar 02)
- Re: More on Vonage service disruptions... Network.Security (Mar 02)
- Re: More on Vonage service disruptions... Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Mar 03)
- Re: More on Vonage service disruptions... John Levine (Mar 03)
- RE: More on Vonage service disruptions... Scott Morris (Mar 03)
- Re: More on Vonage service disruptions... Christopher Woodfield (Mar 04)
- Re: More on Vonage service disruptions... Christopher Woodfield (Mar 04)
- Re: More on Vonage service disruptions... Jeffrey Race (Mar 04)
- Re: More on Vonage service disruptions... John R Levine (Mar 04)
- Re: More on Vonage service disruptions... Robert Blayzor (Mar 04)
- Re: More on Vonage service disruptions... John Levine (Mar 03)
- Re: More on Vonage service disruptions... Joel Jaeggli (Mar 04)