nanog mailing list archives
Re: Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites
From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 08:42:36 -0600 (CST)
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:32:41 GMT To: nanog () merit edu "The Utah governor is deciding whether to sign a bill that would require Internet providers to block Web sites deemed pornographic and that could also target e-mail providers and search engines." http://news.com.com/Utah+governor+weighs+antiporn+proposal/2100-1028_3-5598912.html?tag=nefd.top
<yawn> The statute will be *dead* on on a Federal 1st Amend. challenge, if enacted, -- Q. What has an I.Q. of 200? A. The state legislature. *Collectively*. (*good* sig-monster! :)
Current thread:
- Re: Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites, (continued)
- Re: Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites Gary E. Miller (Mar 04)
- Re: Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites Eric Gauthier (Mar 04)
- RE: Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites Joe Johnson (Mar 04)
- Re: Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites Steve Sobol (Mar 06)
- Re: Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites Eric A. Hall (Mar 06)
- Re: Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 06)
- Re: Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites Richard Irving (Mar 04)
- Re: Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites William Allen Simpson (Mar 04)
- Re: Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites Nanog Deform (Mar 04)
- Re: Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites William Allen Simpson (Mar 04)