nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Email Services Association ( wasRE: Why do so few mail providers su
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:01:35 +0100
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 05:44:26AM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote a message of 27 lines which said:
I'm skeptical that a model that only sort of works for under 30K ASNs and maybe 1K bilateral peering agreements for the *really* big Tier-1s won't scale to a world that has 40M+ .com domains and probably a million SMTP servers.
The agenda of the people who praise "email peering" is probably to change that. "Should anyone be allowed to operate an email system? Perhaps not." AOL postmaster Carl Hutzler http://www.circleid.com/article/917_0_1_0_C/
Current thread:
- Re: Internet Email Services Association ( wasRE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?) Kee Hinckley (Feb 28)
- Re: Internet Email Services Association Douglas Otis (Feb 28)
- Re: Internet Email Services Association ( wasRE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?) Michael . Dillon (Mar 01)
- Re: Internet Email Services Association ( wasRE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 01)
- Re: Internet Email Services Association ( wasRE: Why do so few mail providers su Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 01)
- Re: Internet Email Services Association ( wasRE: Why do so few mail providers su Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 01)
- Re: Internet Email Services Association ( wasRE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?) Michael . Dillon (Mar 01)
- Re: Internet Email Services Association Chris Edwards (Mar 01)
- Re: Internet Email Services Association Michael . Dillon (Mar 01)
- Re: Internet Email Services Association ( wasRE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 01)
- Re: Internet Email Services Association ( wasRE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?) Todd Vierling (Mar 01)
- Re: Internet Email Services Association Niels Bakker (Mar 02)