nanog mailing list archives
Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP
From: Adi Linden <adil () adis on ca>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 08:45:30 -0600
If VOIP doesn't run on your network because you've oversold your capacity, no amount of QoS is going to put the quality back into your service. People will find better ISPs. If you deliberately set QoS to favor your services over a competitor, whom your customers are also paying for service, you'll be staring down prosecutors, at some point. It's anti-competitive behavior, as you're taking deliberate actions to degrade the service of a competitor, simply because you can.
Let's say I sell a premium VoIP offering for an additional fee on my network. I apply QoS to deliver my VoIP offering to my customers but as a result all other VoIP service is literally useless during heavy use times you'd consider this anti-competitive behavior? Adi
Current thread:
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP, (continued)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Thor Lancelot Simon (Mar 04)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Adi Linden (Mar 04)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Eric A. Hall (Mar 04)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP John Levine (Mar 04)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Eric A. Hall (Mar 04)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Michael . Dillon (Mar 07)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Bill Nash (Mar 04)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Robert Blayzor (Mar 04)
- RE: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Vivien M. (Mar 05)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Bill Nash (Mar 06)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Adi Linden (Mar 07)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Bill Nash (Mar 07)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Rachael Treu (Mar 07)
- Message not available
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Nathan Allen Stratton (Mar 05)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Adam Rothschild (Mar 05)