nanog mailing list archives
Re: sorbs.net
From: "Paul G" <paul () rusko us>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:44:41 -0500
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rich Kulawiec" <rsk () gsp org> To: <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 5:43 PM Subject: Re: sorbs.net
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:21:35AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:o could this be used as a dos and then become extortion?Unlikely. Blocklists are used by choice, and blocklists which either aren't effective or don't have sane policies don't get chosen often. (See "BLARS", which even blars was recommending that you don't use the last time I checked.)
unfortunately, that *still* didn't stop people from using it, which translated into an unresolvable headache for me as a sp. if you don't consider a blacklist to be usable by the public, don't publish it. however, publishing a draconian blacklist seems to get you a 'hardcore' label/clout in certain circles and is thus irresistible for some. -p
Current thread:
- Re: sorbs.net, (continued)
- Re: sorbs.net Dan Hollis (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Michael . Dillon (Mar 16)
- Re: sorbs.net Jay Hennigan (Mar 16)
- Re: sorbs.net Bruce Campbell (Mar 15)
- RE: sorbs.net David Schwartz (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Matthew Sullivan (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Paul G (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Randy Bush (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Rich Kulawiec (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Paul G (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Rich Kulawiec (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Jason Slagle (Mar 21)
- Message not available
- Re: sorbs.net Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 21)
- Re: sorbs.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 21)
- Re: sorbs.net Michael . Dillon (Mar 22)
- Re: sorbs.net Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 22)
- Re: sorbs.net Michael . Dillon (Mar 22)
- Re: sorbs.net Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 22)