nanog mailing list archives
Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited
From: Peter John Hill <peterjhill () cmu edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 09:42:57 -0800
On Mar 28, 2005, at 8:40 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
I like BGP more as I could transport that /32 with no-export right away.Yes, in a simple hub-and-spoke anycast topology, iBGP is simplest. In awagon-wheel or mesh topology, having an IGP makes some things simplest, though you can still use iBGP in that role.
Yep, use the best routing protocol that you already have running on the connecting routers might be a decent rule of thumb... Therefore enterprises (where I have worked) tend to use ospf.... I can understand service providers using iBGP...
Peter
Current thread:
- Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Joe Shen (Mar 24)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Bill Woodcock (Mar 24)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Alexander Koch (Mar 26)
- MARP (was Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited) Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 26)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Bill Woodcock (Mar 28)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Peter John Hill (Mar 28)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Alexander Koch (Mar 26)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Bill Woodcock (Mar 24)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited just me (Mar 26)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Peter John Hill (Mar 27)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Edward B. Dreger (Mar 27)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Peter John Hill (Mar 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Joe Shen (Mar 24)
- Re: Intradomain DNS Anycast revisited Bill Woodcock (Mar 30)