nanog mailing list archives
Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:36:58 +0200
* > The Register article:
"The report that this week decided the ownership of the second most important directory on the Internet has been called into question with the claim that a fundamental element of it is factually incorrect."
Apparently, the main criticism is that DENIC developed the core of its operations (the main database) on its own, without hiring consultants. I find this criticism a bit strange as well, but it makes some sense if you are extremely risk adverse. The main question is why DENIC wasn't aware of this criterion before it made its offer (or the requirement to be a customer of some disaster recovery company). Anyway, DENIC's offer didn't match that of Sentan or Verisign in many aspects, so it's a non-issue in the end.
Current thread:
- Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Lucy E. Lynch (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Paul Vixie (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Florian Weimer (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Florian Weimer (Mar 31)
- report of .biz outage... Edward Lewis (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Arnold Nipper (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Florian Weimer (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Bill Woodcock (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 31)