nanog mailing list archives
Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd)
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 10:48:56 +0100
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Edward B. Dreger wrote:
When anycast gets _really_ interesting is when an anycasted client makes a request [from an anycasted address] to an anycasted server.
Why would anyone use an anycast address as a client? Wouldn't it be simpler to make all client connections from the machine's unicast address? Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/ BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR GOOD.
Current thread:
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited, (continued)
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited Rodney Joffe (May 03)
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited Todd Vierling (May 03)
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited Paul Vixie (May 04)
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Patrick W. Gilmore (May 03)
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Edward B. Dreger (May 03)
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Patrick W. Gilmore (May 03)
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Edward B. Dreger (May 03)
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Patrick W. Gilmore (May 03)
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Edward B. Dreger (May 03)
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Patrick W. Gilmore (May 03)
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Edward B. Dreger (May 03)
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Tony Finch (May 04)
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Edward B. Dreger (May 04)
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Joe Abley (May 04)