nanog mailing list archives
Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 23:35:26 -0400
On May 1, 2005, at 11:29 PM, Dean Anderson wrote:
On Sun, 1 May 2005, Joe Maimon wrote:
Dean Anderson wrote:And if they aren't found by open-relay blacklists, they aren't abused and there are no problems whatsoever.How much credibility are you trying to lose?I have 9 years of operational experience running open relays. How many years of open relay operations experience do you have?
I don't think Dean answered the question. Allow me to help. Answer: Absolutely none. -- TTFN, patrick P.S. But only 'cause he had none to start with.
Current thread:
- Re: SMTP AUTH, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: SMTP AUTH Dave Stewart (May 03)
- Re: SMTP AUTH Michael . Dillon (May 04)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Edward B. Dreger (May 01)
- Re: SMTP AUTH Dean Anderson (May 01)
- Re: SMTP AUTH Matthew Sullivan (May 02)
- Re: SMTP AUTH Dean Anderson (May 03)
- Re: SMTP AUTH Matthew Sullivan (May 03)
- Re: SMTP AUTH Dean Anderson (May 03)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Joe Maimon (May 01)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (May 01)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Patrick W. Gilmore (May 01)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 01)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Matthew Sullivan (May 02)