nanog mailing list archives
Re: soBGP deployment
From: Russ White <ruwhite () cisco com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 07:19:48 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
the certificates are carried ... in soBGP in a new BGP message.btw, am i supposed to be cheered by yet another overloading of bgp?
Since S-BGP overloads signatures into the current packet formats, destroys packing, and destroys peer groups, I'm not certain that you can make the claim that S-BGP has a "lower impact" on BGP than soBGP does. In fact, to the contrary, you might have noticed that the transport draft is set up all on its own, specifically so any other transport could be substituted.
If someone wants to deploy some other transport, and there's community interest in doing so, then soBGP could be done without touching BGP at all.
:-) Russ __________________________________ riw () cisco com CCIE <>< Grace Alone
Current thread:
- Re: soBGP deployment, (continued)
- Re: soBGP deployment Larry J. Blunk (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Larry J. Blunk (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Steven M. Bellovin (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Tony Li (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 24)
- Re: soBGP deployment Russ White (May 24)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 24)
- Re: soBGP deployment Michael . Dillon (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Russ White (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Russ White (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Edward Lewis (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Michael . Dillon (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment william(at)elan.net (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment bmanning (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Daniel Golding (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Jeroen Massar (May 23)