nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000
From: Adam McKenna <adam () flounder net>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 17:40:12 -0700
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 12:28:32AM +0000, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
I really didn't mean to start an off-topic rat-hole discussion, but instead, point out how bad (nonchalant, cavalier) site security has become with reagards to storing sensitive information.
Has it really 'gotten' bad or just been that way all along? I don't know how the security was where you went to college, but at my school, people's SSN's were posted up on grading sheets for all to see. The names were missing, but still, you could easily get them just by watching people check their grades. --Adam
Current thread:
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000, (continued)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Jon Lewis (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Florian Weimer (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Bob Vaughan (May 27)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Nicole (May 31)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Stephen Sprunk (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Daniel Golding (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Edward Lewis (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Joel Jaeggli (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Adam McKenna (May 25)