nanog mailing list archives
Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:27:16 +0000 (GMT)
Hi John,
Even with cold-potato routing, there is an expense in handling increased levels of traffic that is destined for your network. This increase in traffic often has no new revenue associated with it, because it is fanning out to thousands of flat-rate consumer/small-business connections (e.g. DSL) where billing is generally by peak capacity not usage.
not true for cogent tho, we know that virtually all their traffic is usage based transit customers Steve
Current thread:
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now John Curran (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now John Curran (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Pete Templin (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now vijay gill (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Pete Templin (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Pete Templin (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Jeff Aitken (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now John Curran (Nov 01)