nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses
From: Lincoln Dale <ltd () interlink com au>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:03:28 +1100
Steven Bakker wrote:
A lot of people are deploying C76xx as peering routers ...<rant> ... which should be prohibited by law. Actually, C76xx should be prohibited by law. </rant>
i know the current sport de jour in nanog is vendor bashing - but what specifically do you see as faults in the c6500/7600?
off-list or on-list - i don't mind - although don't want to violate any nanog policies.
cheers, lincoln.
Current thread:
- RE: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses, (continued)
- RE: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Chris Roberts (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Randy Bush (Nov 11)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Will Hargrave (Nov 11)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 11)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Randy Bush (Nov 11)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 11)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Randy Bush (Nov 11)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Mike Hughes (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Steven Bakker (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Lincoln Dale (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses sthaug (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Randy Bush (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Mike Hughes (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Niels Bakker (Nov 11)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Alexander Koch (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Mike Hughes (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Blaine Christian (Nov 10)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Arnold Nipper (Nov 09)