nanog mailing list archives
Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions
From: Christian Kuhtz <kuhtzch () corp earthlink net>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:21:12 -0500
On Nov 2, 2005, at 9:54 AM, Daniel Golding wrote:
They ARE using your pipes right now, and they AREN'T paying you money. The funny thing is that your customers ARE paying you money for access to Google and Yahoo. Broadband gets a lot less compelling without content, so don'tpush it.
Hah. Classic. But, but, Dan, that trick-or-treating wasn't all. But if they harness their own content, then what would you have.. a captive supplier to an mono/whateverpoly? Oh what fun that would be for Christmas, on a one horse open sleigh. 'Tis the season, guys. Ho Ho Ho.
http://www.cabledatacomnews.com/nov05/nov05-6.htmlYou've got to admit, though, the ability to completely fade out reality and invent your own is impressive, and those CEO's ought to be commended.
And while we're doing this with RBOCs, we can bitch about MSOs just the same. One might find a surprising number of similarities.
Best regards, Christian
Current thread:
- Re: Equal access to content, (continued)
- Re: Equal access to content Mike Leber (Nov 03)
- Re: Equal access to content Randy Bush (Nov 03)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Christian Kuhtz (Nov 02)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Randy Bush (Nov 02)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Christian Kuhtz (Nov 02)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions David Barak (Nov 02)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Deepak Jain (Nov 02)
- RE: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Wayne Gustavus (nanog) (Nov 03)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Sean Donelan (Nov 03)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Daniel Golding (Nov 02)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Christian Kuhtz (Nov 02)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 02)