nanog mailing list archives
Re: Equal access to content
From: Doug Barton <dougb () dougbarton us>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:52:34 -0800
Sean Donelan wrote:
Should content suppliers be required to provide equal access to all networks? Or can content suppliers enter into exclusive contracts?
SBC and Yahoo! have already answered this question (for example). I also think that most people on this list will remember the early days of broadband suppliers like RoadRunner who tried to build a "we are mostly local content, plus some Internet access" model which the customers hated, and they (for the most part) eventually abandoned altogether. Even AOL was forced by market pressure to provide real Internet to its customers. Doug .oO(Glad I don't own any SBC stock ...) -- If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough
Current thread:
- SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Daniel Golding (Nov 02)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Randy Bush (Nov 02)
- Equal access to content Sean Donelan (Nov 02)
- Re: Equal access to content Randy Bush (Nov 02)
- Re: Equal access to content Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 02)
- Re: Equal access to content Blaine Christian (Nov 02)
- Re: Equal access to content Doug Barton (Nov 02)
- Re: Equal access to content Andy Davidson (Nov 03)
- Re: Equal access to content Christian Kuhtz (Nov 03)
- Equal access to content Sean Donelan (Nov 02)
- Re: Equal access to content Mike Leber (Nov 03)
- Re: Equal access to content Mike Leber (Nov 03)
- Re: Equal access to content Randy Bush (Nov 03)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Randy Bush (Nov 02)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Randy Bush (Nov 02)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Christian Kuhtz (Nov 02)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions David Barak (Nov 02)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Deepak Jain (Nov 02)