nanog mailing list archives
Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:21:23 -0400
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:53:12 CDT, John Dupuy said:
In fact, this is technically feasible right now with IPv4. Does anyone know of a pair of ISPs doing this?
"technically feasible" and "business case reasonable" are two different things. Under what conditions does this sort of cooperation with a competitor make sense?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation), (continued)
- Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation) Owen DeLong (Oct 24)
- Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation) John Reilly (Oct 24)
- Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation) Pekka Savola (Oct 25)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Andre Oppermann (Oct 21)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Owen DeLong (Oct 21)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Michael . Dillon (Oct 24)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Owen DeLong (Oct 24)
- RE: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Gary E. Miller (Oct 21)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 24)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Joe Maimon (Oct 24)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Joe Abley (Oct 24)