nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:27:06 +0200
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 10:57:59AM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
The big gap in the multi-homing story for v6 is for end sites, since those are specifically excluded by all the RIRs' policies on PI addressing right now. Shim6 is intended to be a solution for end sites.
But isn't a solution for many (most?) of them, EVEN if it would be universally implemented everywhere[tm]. This is a known problem, and it was decided to aim for a 80%[1] solution (80% of the problem space, not 80% of folks in need). There is still not half of an idea for a solution for the full problem in sight. Best regards, Daniel [1] number made up -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr () cluenet de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news Sabri Berisha (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Marshall Eubanks (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Sabri Berisha (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Marshall Eubanks (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Jeroen Massar (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Joe Abley (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Jeroen Massar (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Joe Abley (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Oct 15)
- shim6 ... easy? bmanning (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Oct 15)