nanog mailing list archives
Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?)
From: Matt Ghali <matt () snark net>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Michael Painter wrote: I'd be very interested in what folks here think of this: http://news.com.com/Time+for+a+real+Internet+highway/2010-1028_3-5894664.html?tag=carsl I think it's a news.com.com.com URL, and therefore most likely not very worth opening, much less reading. I'm very interested in why you didn't bother at least summarizing the story as a general courtesy to folks here. matto --matt () snark net------------------------------------------<darwin>< The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
Current thread:
- Time for a real Internet highway (?) Michael Painter (Oct 14)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) Matt Ghali (Oct 14)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) Michael Painter (Oct 14)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Oct 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) J. Oquendo (Oct 14)
- RE: Time for a real Internet highway (?) David Schwartz (Oct 14)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) Scott Weeks (Oct 15)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) Randy Bush (Oct 15)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) Matt Ghali (Oct 14)