Re: IPv6 news

[David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>]

On Oct 15, 2005, at 9:08 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
> but when similar things were proposed
> at other meetings, somebody always said "no! we have to have end-to- 
> end,
> and if we'd wanted nat-around-every-net we'd've stuck with IPv4."

Hmm.

Is VJ compression considered a violation of the "end-to-end" principle?

Or perhaps I misunderstand (yet again).

Rgds,
-drc