nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering
From: Mike Tancsa <mike () sentex net>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:00:45 -0400
At 01:43 PM 05/10/2005, Jeff Shultz wrote:
And why isn't this apparently happening automatically? Pardon the density of my brain matter here, but I thought that was what BGP was all about?
The assumption you are making is that Cogent has a full view from someone of all prefixes outside AS174 and that someone is providing a full view of AS174 to their downstreams/peers etc. My guess is this is not the case.
---Mike
Current thread:
- RE: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering), (continued)
- RE: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Sean Butler (Oct 05)
- Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Richard Irving (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Justin M. Streiner (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Senie (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Jeff Shultz (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering James (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Payne (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Jeff Shultz (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Joe Abley (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Joe Abley (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Mike Tancsa (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Curran (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Simon Lockhart (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Jeff Shultz (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Micheal Patterson (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Chris Stone (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Alex Rubenstein (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Jeff Shultz (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Justin M. Streiner (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Pete Templin (Oct 05)