nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: Todd Vierling <tv () duh org>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:43:43 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Michael.Dillon () btradianz com wrote:
Again, phone numbers and their portability can and should not be compared with the IP address portability issues. They're very different animals.That's your elephant. My elephant looks different.
Survey says... BZZZZZT. Read about SS7 LNP implementation before speaking, please. They are very different creatures. Something that resembles telephony LNP will not scale to the quantity of micro-streams currently used by WWW applications. The reason it works (FSVO "works") for telephony is because, unlike TCP streams, telephone circuits are comparatively large streams with much longer keepalive times. -- -- Todd Vierling <tv () duh org> <tv () pobox com> <todd () vierling name>
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 news Todd Vierling (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 news Tom Vest (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 news John Dupuy (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Jeroen Massar (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 17)
- geo-based routing [Re: IPv6 news] Pekka Savola (Oct 17)
- Re: non-provider aggregation, was: IPv6 news Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 19)
- Re: non-provider aggregation, was: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 news Gary E. Miller (Oct 17)