nanog mailing list archives
Re: multi homing pressure
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:48:44 -0400
On Oct 19, 2005, at 3:31 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
John Payne wrote:
[...]
If you don't have multihoming requirements other than availability then it really can be fire and forget.Except for those pesky bogon filters.... which corporations seem to liketo "fire and forget".
Perhaps that's something you should "outsource" to your provider?Plus, you missed the part: "If you don't have multihoming requirements other than availability". Bogon filters do _not_ enhance availability. (And please don't argue about things like attacks from unallocated space - the disconnectivity caused by un- updated bogon filters is much higher than the increase from things like this.)
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Re: multi homing pressure, (continued)
- Re: multi homing pressure Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Todd Vierling (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Elmar K. Bins (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Todd Vierling (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Edward Lewis (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Justin M. Streiner (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Edward B. Dreger (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure John Payne (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Mark Radabaugh (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 19)
- RE: multi homing pressure Peter Kranz (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 19)
- RE: multi homing pressure Ejay Hire (Oct 21)
- Re: multi homing pressure Todd Vierling (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Owen DeLong (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Jon Lewis (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Owen DeLong (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Jon Lewis (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Paul Vixie (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Mike Tancsa (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Elmar K. Bins (Oct 19)