nanog mailing list archives
Re: LACNIC to start allocating from 189/8 and 190/8
From: matthew zeier <mrz () velvet org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:28:47 -0700
Sprint's not playing nice. All of my upstreams appear to dump it to sprint at some point and I get:
10 sl-bb22-orl-14-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.19.130) [AS 1239] 64 msec 68 msec 72 msec 11 sl-st20-mia-14-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.8.56) [AS 1239] 84 msec 84 msec 84 msec 12 sl-brazi-1-0.sprintlink.net (144.223.244.26) [AS 1239] 188 msec 188 msec 188 msec
13 * * * Ricardo Patara wrote:
Hello, Commenting myself, there is an machine in the first address of each the announced blocks. Just in the case someone want to ping/traceroute. (189.0.0.1, 189.128.0.1, 190.0.0.1, 190.128.0.1) I forgot to mention this before. Ricardo Patara
Current thread:
- LACNIC to start allocating from 189/8 and 190/8 Ricardo Patara (Oct 18)
- Re: LACNIC to start allocating from 189/8 and 190/8 Ricardo Patara (Oct 20)
- Re: LACNIC to start allocating from 189/8 and 190/8 Randy Bush (Oct 20)
- Re: LACNIC to start allocating from 189/8 and 190/8 Chris Griffin (Oct 20)
- Re: LACNIC to start allocating from 189/8 and 190/8 Bill Sehmel (Oct 20)
- Re: LACNIC to start allocating from 189/8 and 190/8 Daniel Senie (Oct 20)
- Re: LACNIC to start allocating from 189/8 and 190/8 Randy Bush (Oct 20)
- Re: LACNIC to start allocating from 189/8 and 190/8 matthew zeier (Oct 20)
- Re: LACNIC to start allocating from 189/8 and 190/8 Ricardo Patara (Oct 20)
- Re: LACNIC to start allocating from 189/8 and 190/8 Randy Bush (Oct 20)
- Re: LACNIC to start allocating from 189/8 and 190/8 Ricardo Patara (Oct 20)