nanog mailing list archives

Re: OT: Yahoo- apparently now an extension of the Chinese govt secret police....


From: Michael Greb <michael () thegrebs com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:53:09 -0500

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 09:19:46AM +0100, Simon Waters wrote:

On Thursday 08 Sep 2005 3:09 am, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

And when the corporate executives have a legal and moral obligation to
generate income for the stockholders (barring a stockholder's resolution
or other similar instrument dictating otherwise), what is one to do when
"vast profits" and "vast evil" lie in the same direction?

Moralities aren't black and white, generating profits falls behind other legal 
and moral obligations that apply to everyone.

Except, they don't in the United States corporations have a legal
obligation to put profits above all else.  They are legally forbidden to
put morality above profit.  These laws are severyly in need of some
adjustments.

Even Google, with it's "Don't Be Evil" policy

Any influence Google's "Don't be Evil" policy had vanished the day it was 
floated AFAICT.

Where profits are put before morals that is called greed. Sure the 

No, that is following the law.

stockmarkets allow people to put greedy people in charge of their money, but 
be aware what goes around, comes around.

HG Wells referred to people investing in the stockmarket as a purely financial 
endevour for short term profits as "the irresponsibly wealthy" as far back as 
1902. Plus ça change.

Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Current thread: