nanog mailing list archives

Re: Multi-6 [WAS: OT - Vint Cerf joins Google]


From: Patrick W.Gilmore <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 02:31:42 -0400


On Sep 11, 2005, at 12:32 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:

Content providers and other large business, without who's funds the Internet would fail, have a right not to be tied to a single provider. And while I

Giving each entity who wants to multihome an AS of their own and own address block, doesn't scale. Think this in the way of each home in the world being multihomed, it just doesn't scale.

We disagree. And your hyperbole doesn't come close to proving your argument.


IPv6 solved the addressing problem, not the routing problem, in the current model. Let's try to fix the routing problem NOW instead of 5-10 years down the road.

Yes, let's.

See you on shim6.

--
TTFN,
patrick


Current thread: