nanog mailing list archives
Re: mail service with no mx (was - Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response?)
From: Crist Clark <crist.clark () globalstar com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 17:43:20 -0700
Adam McKenna wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 04:31:05PM -0700, william(at)elan.net wrote:Telnet option negotiation is at Layer 7 after TCP connection has been established. Firewalls typically don't operate at this level (TCP session is Layer 4 if I remember right) and would refuse or reject (difference type of ICMP response) based solely on attempt to connect to certain ip or certain TCP/UDP port.Application layer firewalls have existed for at least 6 years.
AAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHH! But the point is that you would still establish a TCP connection before a MTA, firewall, IPS, or whatever could know it was telnet! The FEMA address that started this whole thing was timing out. You can tell the difference between a telnet filter and something completely, silently blocking 25/tcp. CAN THIS DIE NOW? Pulllleeeeeese... -- Crist J. Clark crist.clark () globalstar com Globalstar Communications (408) 933-4387
Current thread:
- Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response?, (continued)
- Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response? Eric A. Hall (Sep 13)
- Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response? William Allen Simpson (Sep 13)
- Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response? Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 13)
- Message not available
- Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response? Mike Tancsa (Sep 13)
- Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 14)
- Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response? Mike Tancsa (Sep 14)
- mail service with no mx (was - Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response?) william(at)elan.net (Sep 13)
- mail service with no mx (was - Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response?) Roy Badami (Sep 13)
- Re: mail service with no mx (was - Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response?) william(at)elan.net (Sep 13)
- Re: mail service with no mx (was - Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response?) Adam McKenna (Sep 13)
- Re: mail service with no mx (was - Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response?) Crist Clark (Sep 13)
- Re: mail service with no mx (was - Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response?) Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 13)
- Re: mail service with no mx (was - Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response?) Dave Crocker (Sep 13)
- Re: mail service with no mx (was - Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response?) Joseph S D Yao (Sep 14)
- Re: mail service with no mx (was - Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response?) Robert E . Seastrom (Sep 14)
- Re: mail service with no mx (was - Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response?) Joseph S D Yao (Sep 15)
- Re: mail service with no mx (was - Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response?) Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 14)
- Re: mail service with no mx (was - Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response?) Joseph S D Yao (Sep 13)
- Re: mail service with no mx (was - Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response?) Tony Finch (Sep 14)
- Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response? Christian Kuhtz (Sep 13)
- Re: Computer systems blamed for feeble hurricane response? william(at)elan.net (Sep 13)