nanog mailing list archives

Re: image stream routers

From: sthaug () nethelp no
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 19:11:14 +0200 (CEST)

A collegue smartbits tested a 1GHz pc, with a full feed and 250k
simoultaneons flows it managed around 250kpps. This also with freebsd
and device polling. It sounds to me like a software based machine can
be plenty fast with good code under the hood.


Sorry, in today's world of high-end routers 250kpps doesn't qualify as
"plenty fast". Can your box do linerate Gigabit Ethernet with minimum
size packets, on several ports simultaneously?

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug () nethelp no

Current thread:

image stream routers Matt Hess (Sep 16)
- Re: image stream routers Greg Boehnlein (Sep 16)
  - RE: image stream routers Christopher J. Wolff (Sep 16)
    - RE: image stream routers Greg Boehnlein (Sep 16)
    - Re: image stream routers Lincoln Dale (Sep 16)
    - Quality of User Experience (was RE: image stream routers) Christopher J. Wolff (Sep 16)
    - Re: Quality of User Experience (was RE: image stream routers) Lincoln Dale (Sep 17)
    - Re: Quality of User Experience (was RE: image stream routers) Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 17)
    - Re: Quality of User Experience (was RE: image stream routers) Randy Bush (Sep 17)
    - Re: image stream routers tony sarendal (Sep 17)
    - Re: image stream routers sthaug (Sep 17)
    - Re: image stream routers tony sarendal (Sep 17)
    - Re: image stream routers tony sarendal (Sep 17)
    - Re: image stream routers Paul G (Sep 17)
    - Re: image stream routers Deepak Jain (Sep 17)
    - Re: image stream routers tony sarendal (Sep 17)
    - Re: image stream routers Jon Lewis (Sep 17)
    - Re: image stream routers sthaug (Sep 17)
    - Re: image stream routers Edward B. Dreger (Sep 17)
    - Re: image stream routers Edward B. Dreger (Sep 17)
    - Re: image stream routers Lincoln Dale (Sep 17)

(Thread continues...)