nanog mailing list archives
Re: router worms and International Infrastructure
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 06:26:13 -1000
anyway, I just don't want folks to get the wrong impression about either uRPF or 'feasible path'.
you were quite right there. sorry not to make that clear. randy
Current thread:
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure, (continued)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 19)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Gadi Evron (Sep 19)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 20)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Gadi Evron (Sep 20)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 20)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Michael . Dillon (Sep 21)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Pekka Savola (Sep 21)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 21)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Randy Bush (Sep 21)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 21)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Randy Bush (Sep 21)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Pekka Savola (Sep 21)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 21)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Pekka Savola (Sep 22)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 22)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Pekka Savola (Sep 22)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Matthew Crocker (Sep 22)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 22)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Florian Weimer (Sep 19)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 19)
- Re: router worms and International Infrastructure Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 19)